> I don't have a specific problem with all of this, except I keep thinking a better solution would be to hammer browser manufacturers to keep their shit up to date or explain why they are not doing so.
That's the thing though. When a new proposal comes out, if it's released in the form of a macro it can be tested without vendor buy in. The pressure relief on vendors to keep up to date with the standard is just an unintended (maybe negative * ) side effect.
* Personally I like being able to count on "current" features and I'm not opposed to using shims to patch the environment up to a workable level.
That's the thing though. When a new proposal comes out, if it's released in the form of a macro it can be tested without vendor buy in. The pressure relief on vendors to keep up to date with the standard is just an unintended (maybe negative * ) side effect.
* Personally I like being able to count on "current" features and I'm not opposed to using shims to patch the environment up to a workable level.