Looking at the source to rachet, it seems @fat is back to using ; again.

Kind of fits with what he says in the article: "For me, Bootstrap is very fun, not serious – nearly every line is a joke. It’s trying to provoke you. Taking shortcuts. Demanding that you reread it. Reread it again. It’s very pop. Very optimistic, yung. Forward. Playful."

"The code for my latest project Ratchet is very different. It’s very conservative. It’s not meant to draw attention to itself. It’s very explicit. Assertive, necessary. It’s easy to approach. It’s a vanilla milkshake."

Meta: I clicked through to this link without pause but then I noticed the tld. Is that enough to get you blocked on corporate networks?

And on the flip side, can you get in trouble for visting it?

I clicked on it after noticing how edgy looking the domain was. That guy must be super cool or something.

Fat is self-aware enough where its not annoying. Nothing wrong with having a "character".

It was blocked on my network when I clicked it by accident. We'll see if anyone runs over and yells at me in the next few minutes.

Ruby has the same variability of expressiveness that he's describing with Javascript. Arguably more so. One of the reasons I love it so much.