Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Peer review is still very relevant in climate science. But given it is from well-respected authors, I am more inclined to trust the results at this stage.
 help



There is no need for "trust".

There is no benefit in non-expert readers inserting their own subjectivity into an already complex topic. Even for themselves.

What we know: It is an interesting paper. It is going to get attention.

Good to be aware. It is also good to reserve judgement while the community evaluates the results.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: