Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

At a guess that's because my comment attracted more up-votes than the other top-level comments in the thread.

I generally try to include something in a comment that's not information already under discussion - in this case that was the link and quote from the original README.



of course your comment attracts more upvotes - it's at the top.


It’s at the top because of upvotes. They don’t have an “if simonw: boost” branch in the code.


the code is not public, so we can't know. i think it's much more nuanced and certain users' comments might get a preferential treatment, based on factors other than the upvote count - which itself is hidden from us.


> the code is not public, so we can't know.

I feel like you're making this statement in bad faith, rather than honestly believing the developers of the forum software here have built in a clause to pin simonw's comments to the top.


> certain users' comments might get a preferential treatment

This does not happen. It hasn't even happened when pg made the forum in the first place.


I thought dang explicitly said it does happen? It certainly happens for stories.


Attention feeds attention.

Attention is ALL You Need.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: