Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Low-quality is relative. LLMs' low-quality is most people's above-average. The fact the copy - either way - is likely to go through some sort of copy-by-committee process makes the case for LLMs even stronger (i.e., why waste your time). Not always, but quite often.


No it's not. It's low quality because it's extremely verbose and that wastes time.


That's a function of the prompt. The tool only performs as well as you're able to instruct it.


You expect people who cannot write to become skilled writers to instruct llms?


No. I'm expecting you not to blame the screwdriver because people decide to use it as a hammer.

But to your point, you might not like the slop, but that slop, sadly, is still better than what it would have been otherwise.


It's just longer, it won't carry more information.


The irony here is great. Perfect. Thank you for proving my point. I can see why you struggle with LLMs.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: