I'm saying that "free speech" means they can say things without being intentionally targeted for removal by the government.
These people aren't illegal immigrants - we're talking about revoking the visas for people here legally under visa programs.
So go answer the question (or keep desperately refusing to...):
Why should a visa holder be targeted and removed for making use of their free speech? How does that reconcile in your head with "I'm all for free speech".
---
> Do you think that saying things that I don't like should de facto grant you citizenship?
This is... gently put - A stupid fucking response. I'm saying that a visa holder shouldn't be removed or otherwise punished for making speech. I think speech shouldn't really impact their visa outside of some clear and sane limits (ex - if they advocate violently overthrowing the US government... sure, lets talk about that visa).
They are here legally with legal visa - why do you confidently proclaim that you are for free speech if you believe that their speech should result in revoked visas?
That's not free speech. That's curtailed speech. AKA - you are not pro free speech.
> I'm saying that a visa holder shouldn't be removed or otherwise punished for making speech.
You seem to think that being sent to your own country is a punishment. I do not. This is going to be a sticking point if you are trying to convince me of something.
These people aren't illegal immigrants - we're talking about revoking the visas for people here legally under visa programs.
So go answer the question (or keep desperately refusing to...):
Why should a visa holder be targeted and removed for making use of their free speech? How does that reconcile in your head with "I'm all for free speech".
---
> Do you think that saying things that I don't like should de facto grant you citizenship?
This is... gently put - A stupid fucking response. I'm saying that a visa holder shouldn't be removed or otherwise punished for making speech. I think speech shouldn't really impact their visa outside of some clear and sane limits (ex - if they advocate violently overthrowing the US government... sure, lets talk about that visa).
They are here legally with legal visa - why do you confidently proclaim that you are for free speech if you believe that their speech should result in revoked visas?
That's not free speech. That's curtailed speech. AKA - you are not pro free speech.