Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We cannot do all of it. The money and the manpower does not exist to do all of it.

We need to prioritize. Have you ever tried to survive in the wilderness? Shelter, water, fire, and food. Priorities. You would not spend your time trying to find out if there is a form of life 20 feet below you.

Right now on earth there are plenty of people who do not have these basics.



"Have you ever tried to survive in the wilderness? "

Often enough. Quite succesful, even though I brought most basic supplies with me. So I know about basic needs.

"Right now on earth there are plenty of people who do not have these basics."

And there is a possibility, that this always will be the case. And I would not wait to find out and stop with all general progress till then.

My compassion is with humanity as its whole, not with every single human. I fear, I have not limitless compassion and I don't see, how we can stop all wars just like that(the main reason for famine today - can you stop the Gaza war for instance?), but I see how little effort can be spend to finance such an interesting mission.

Also, space exploration is a tool to bring humanity together.


The US spends more per capita on healthcare, then similar first world nations spend providing public healthcare to all their citizens.[1]

The US has the worst infant mortality, and maternal mortality rates, of any first world nation.[2]

Just think of it: with the highest spend of GDP per citizen, and getting so much less you're the butt of every other country's jokes about healthcare systems.

"Lack of money" has so little to do with the conditions in the US, it's essentially negligence to think it's the problem. The US doesn't want to fix any of the problems you list: it easily could, with the resources it has today.

[1] https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2...

[2] https://www.ajmc.com/view/us-has-highest-infant-maternal-mor...


The money does exist, and manpower isn't a problem considering how many people this planet has. The problem is the small monority that has most of the money, and doesn't like to pay their fair share of taxes.

"As of late 2022, according to Snopes, 735 billionaires collectively possessed more wealth than the bottom half of U.S. households ($4.5 trillion and $4.1 trillion respectively). The top 1% held a total of $43.45 trillion."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_Unite...


> The money and the manpower does not exist to do all of it.

No, they both exist. Motivation by your legislator is what doesn't exist. There's a reason some departments get almost everything they ask for and others get almost nothing: they know how to grease the political machine. That doesn't mean we should fight over scraps for science and social programs, it means you need to acknowledge that there's a game that needs playing. And yeah, it feels real bad that there are lives at stake playing that game, but that's the fault of capitalism, not science.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: