Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Don't the HN guidelines have something about "assuming good faith"? I can't be arsed to check now because obviously the comment above is not in good faith.

/s



It's assume the best possible interpretation and the other commenter has provided evidence to the contrary through multiple posts


The guidelines explicitly say "Assume good faith":

Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

The guidelines don't say anything about being free to be a dick when the other person is being a jerk. They even say not to:

Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: