A poster at a conference stand a good chance to get more and better peer feedback than what is afforded to the peer review of the average journal paper.
Hmm, not the case in my experience going to Society for Neuroscience for 25 years. If you are luck you get useful (non-critical) feedback from 5 people. Why would one “review” a poster seriously? They are often years away from submission even to bioRxiv.
3 cases id single-cell RNA-seq per group, all males. I hope you all appreciate the amazing noise level of single-cell RNAseq. This study should have used bulk RNAseq to keep noise lower.
