Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Moderation in all things, but nothing wrong with a little here and there.

Would you say the same about rape, violence, and murder? Those seem like "natural instincts". Nothing wrong with a little here and there?

I would dispute that racism and sexism are "just like" sexuality, and I would also dispute that all "natural instincts", you might call them animal instincts, ought to be accepted and encouraged. One of the great accomplishments of humanity is to rise above our animal instincts and become, at least temporarily, rational and enlightened.

Sex is necessary for the propagation of the species, and when done right, it's consensual to all parties and also pleasurable, harming nobody. Can you say the same about racism and sexism?



Not sure how you define sexism, but more traditional patriarchal groups have higher birth rates and more social cohesion. In the long run those traits propagate themselves. The stereotypical cat lady, not so much.

As far as racism, it may not propagate the species but surely it helps propagate those genetically closer to oneself. Isn’t in-group preference pretty common? Don’t need to be EO Wilson or Richard Dawkins to see why.


> Not sure how you define sexism

How do you define sexism? I'm not sure how the "stereotypical cat lady" is even relevant.

> more traditional patriarchal groups have higher birth rates

I don't think we need higher birth rates at this point, with over 8 billion humans on Earth already.

> As far as racism, it may not propagate the species but surely it helps propagate those genetically closer to oneself. Isn’t in-group preference pretty common?

Romantic preferences are not racism. Would you say that failure to be bisexual is sexism? (Spoiler: it's not.)

It's crucial to recognize, though, that romantic preferences are entirely subjective. If you consider your romantic preferences to be objectively superior humans and those who aren't to your preference objectively inferior humans who deserve a lower rank in society, that would be racism and/or sexism.


Richard Dawkins said biologists don't offer any indication of ethics. we made by evolution and nature doesn't mean we should live as beast.


With no god, why not? It doesn't matter one way or the other.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: