Almost every server sits on the internet and has one or two (sometimes a couple more) ports open listening for their apps internet traffic.
What the traffic is seems irrelevant to 99.99% of servers out there, imo. Yes there's some questions of what deployments look like and what capabilities operators have but those are details outside the general concern of being safely online. IMO.
> What the traffic is seems irrelevant to 99.99% of servers out there, imo. Yes there's some questions of what deployments look like and what capabilities operators have but those are details outside the general concern of being safely online. IMO.
The following vulnerabilities listing just for the week of 2023-07-17 prove otherwise:
Ideally the traffic would be siphoned thru a load balancer/reverse proxy of some kind rather than the dest service endpoint/port being directly exposed to the internet
What the traffic is seems irrelevant to 99.99% of servers out there, imo. Yes there's some questions of what deployments look like and what capabilities operators have but those are details outside the general concern of being safely online. IMO.