See this comment I made in another post:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33017733#33020509

It's by no means an exhaustive list, but those are some good ones to have. Like I said there, I particularly appreciate the literature on radio.

You want to go higher on the menu hierarchy and explore from "Home" -> "Publications"

I find some of the "Field Manuals" interesting. Some of them have sections on OSINT

https://armypubs.army.mil/ProductMaps/PubForm/FM.aspx

From looking at the list of 141 entries, everything from

TM 5-852-1 ARCTIC AND SUBARCTIC CONSTRUCTION - GENERAL PROVISIONS {AFR 88-19, VOL 1}

onwards looks pretty interesting, as it covers:

- building stuff in arctic

- building stuff to resist nukes

- "security engineering" including electronics

But interestingly enough, I can't figure out how to get PDFs.

> But interestingly enough, I can't figure out how to get PDFs.

Click on the links for each item in the first column. On the details page, you'll get a pdf link.

Connecting from Taiwan I don't actually get a PDF link on the details page.

edit: I see it's maybe not a Taiwan thing (tho some DoD sites are inaccessible from here), some of the other publications sections do have PDF links, just none of the details pages on the TM page in the OP link.

Thanks! Not every directorate has a PDF attached, and given that the first few I tried didn't have them I assumed that none of them had PDFs.

I doubt you'd see anything exciting that's approved for public release

The US often operates as part of a coalition and it is desirable for coalition partners to be able to understand how to cooperate with US army units. If you encrypt docs that you want to share with partners, then you have to share your encryption mechanism, which may be much more problematic.

Also, these sorts of docs contain general procedures, not the actual plans of a specific operation.

Some of these docs are literally how to frame a house. Or set up the plumbing for a communal latrine. Much of it is not sensitive.

Yes. Even things like the average speed of an advancing column of tanks, or the largest vehicle that can cross a particular bridge, are going to be fairly obvious to any army that has its own armoured vehicles.

Fun .gov overclassification anecdote: I worked for a startup that had a contract with .mil and, long story short, we needed a snippet of code that described soil slippage under load, as it remains the gold standard in the simulation of various things including armored vehicles.

IIRC, it had been originally written in the 1950s by the Army Corps of Engineers in FORTRAN (then C, then we used it with Modelica). It was — and is — still export-controlled. I had to get permission to send it to our UK (yes, UK) subsidiary for fear that said deeply dark secrets might reach the eyes of our enemies...

The US Navy docs are held back probably because they won ww2.