I could never take climate change seriously when nuclear wasn't on the table. If climate change were really a concern, you'd consider a power source that's safer than coal, but has negligible CO2 emissions (mining). I'm glad to see people are taking it seriously.
No. When it is a choice between spending 5x plus buying coal for another decade, or spending 1x and displacing carbon immediately, the correct choice is dead obvious, and getting moreso with each passing day as the 5x shades toward 6x and beyond, relentlessly.
