> this seems to be typical sexism: there’s work at home which is paid, and work at home which is not
If it’s not paid, how do those doing it live?
Tax documents call the salary worker + home maker combo “household income”, which may be an appropriate way of thinking about the household getting paid and the household looking after the home.
This applies regardless of the genders of the happy couple, so I’m not sure it’s ‘sexism’.
If it’s not paid, how do those doing it live?
Tax documents call the salary worker + home maker combo “household income”, which may be an appropriate way of thinking about the household getting paid and the household looking after the home.
This applies regardless of the genders of the happy couple, so I’m not sure it’s ‘sexism’.