> Not necessarily, I would consider an interpreter as something entirely different because there is no requirement that it abide to the syntax of the language.
What does this mean? A language interpreter naturally abides to the syntax of the language it implements.
> It doesn’t make sense to me to say this language english is implemented in Spanish and German.
Maybe because natural languages are a useless analogy for this in the first place.
What does this mean? A language interpreter naturally abides to the syntax of the language it implements.
> It doesn’t make sense to me to say this language english is implemented in Spanish and German.
Maybe because natural languages are a useless analogy for this in the first place.